翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(a) : ウィキペディア英語版
Internal Revenue Code section 162(a)

Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (), is part of United States taxation law. It concerns deductions for business expenses. It is one of the most important provisions in the Code, because it is the most widely used authority for deductions.〔See Donaldson, Samuel A., Federal Income Taxation of Individuals: Cases, Problems and Materials, 202 (2nd. Ed. 2007).〕 If an expense is not deductible, then Congress considers the cost to be a consumption expense. Section 162(a) requires six different elements in order to claim a deduction. It must be an
::1) ordinary
::2) and necessary
::3) expense
::4) that was paid or incurred during the taxable year
::5) in carrying on
::6) a trade or business activity.〔IRC Section 162(a).〕
These elements have been interpreted by the courts and administrative agencies to determine if an expenditure is deductible as a business expense.
==Ordinary and Necessary==

In general, the expense should be routine and directly related to the business activity. Ordinary does not require be habitual or made often; the court only requires that the expense is one that is ordinary and necessary for that business.〔''Midland Empire Packing Company v. Commissioner'', 14 T.C. 635 (195)〕 For example, in ''Welch v. Helvering'', the United States Supreme Court found that payments must be both ordinary and necessary to be business expenses; it held that although payments made to a creditor by a taxpayer may have been necessary, they were not ordinary because the circumstances under which they were paid were outside the norms of conduct in society. The ''Welch'' case is frequently cited for its dictum describing the meaning of the term "necessary" in Section 162 as requiring that expenses merely be "appropriate and helpful () the development of the () business."
In ''Jenkins v. Commissioner'', the Tax Court determined that in order to determine if expenditures are deductible under § 162(a), the Court must first ascertain the motive of the taxpayer in making the expenditures, and then determine if there is a sufficient connection between the expenditures and his/her trade or business.〔Tax Court Memo 1983-667.〕 If a taxpayer makes a payment to preserve his/her business reputation, it can be considered an ordinary business expense.〔''Conti v. Commissioner'', 31 T.C.M. 348 (1972).〕 However, if the expenses are inherently personal in nature, they are not deductible under section 162(a).〔''Trebilcock v. Commissioner'', 64 T.C. 852 (1975).〕 In addition, the amount expended must be considered to be reasonable by the court; therefore, if compensation is deemed unreasonable, it exceeds the amount allowable under section 162(a)(1).〔''Harolds Club v. Commissioner'', 340 F.2d 861 (9th Cir. 1965).〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Internal Revenue Code section 162(a)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.